Sep 012017
 

WikiLeaks Truck at the Whitehouse by Wikileaks Mobile Information Collection Unit, commons.wikimedia.org, cc-by-2.0.

by Thomas L. Knapp…….

“It is the sense of Congress,” according to the annual Intelligence Authorization Act now working its way through the US Senate,”that WikiLeaks and the senior leadership of WikiLeaks resemble a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors and should be treated as such a service by the United States.”

US Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) was the lone dissenting vote on the bill, which was approved by the Senate Intelligence Committee in late August. Wyden is on board with Congress’s general anti-Russia/anti-WikiLeaks hatefest, but worries that the bill’s “novel” phraseology might be “applied to journalists inquiring about secrets.” That’s a valid concern as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go nearly far enough.

Simply put the US government’s problem with WikiLeaks — the basis for its claim of hostility —  is that WikiLeaks tells the truth about the US government.

WikiLeaks’s disclosures include material on US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, torture at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, and US spy operations against putative allies (including a scheme cooked up by the CIA and then Secretary of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to spy on United Nations officials).

“Vault 7,” the current round of WikiLeaks disclosures, reveals the tools the Central Intelligence Agency uses to compromise our computers, our telephones, even our televisions, Not to mention the tools it uses to spy on, get this, other US intelligence agencies.

Not that the US government is the sole target of this “non-state hostile intelligence service.” WikiLeaks embarrasses governments around the world by showing their subjects the secrets those governments (yes, including Russia’s) don’t want them to see.

Ever since passage of the National Security Act of 1947, the US government’s “defense” and “intelligence” apparatuses have accustomed themselves to growing  and operating absent any obligation or accountability to the citizens and taxpayers who pay —  in treasure, and sometimes in blood — for their games.

Bottom line: The CIA, the NSA and the other “alphabet soup” agencies of the US government spy on you, lie to you, and commit crimes in your name with presumed impunity. WikiLeaks merely shows you what they’re doing, and has yet to be caught in a lie.

When the US Senate Intelligence Committee declares WikiLeaks “hostile,” the obvious question is “hostile to whom?” WikiLeaks is allied with the American people, while the US intelligence community — and, for the moment at least, the US Senate Intelligence Committee — is our enemy.

~~~~~~~~~~

Thomas L. Knapp (Twitter: @thomaslknapp) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Thomas L. Knapp

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.


 September 1, 2017  Posted by at 12:38 am Issue #234, Thomas L. Knapp  Add comments

  One Response to “WikiLeaks: Hostile is as Hostile Does”

  1. i think accepting wikileakes and assange at face value is a calculus borne in naivete. mere common sense would dictate that a healthy dose of skepticism be applied considering the power and acumen his “adversaries” wield. do you really suppose that if the “power elite” really felt threatened by this organization, or snowden, that they would allow for their continuance? whatever message, or revelation that is “exposed” to the masses can most assuredly have been pre-approved and synthesized into whatever narrative they wish to elucidate. considering the internet was a creation of the military, and most relevant tech companies(google, facebook, MS, Oracle, etc.) are embedded with the clandestine elements of the government, I would severely question the credence of wikileaks, snowden, et al. it is entertaining though.