Apr 292016
 

PEARY COURT PHOTO NIGHT

by Naja and Arnaud Girard…….

After 58% of voters rejected the purchase of Peary Court six weeks ago, some City Commissioners have a new plan: give the City’s affordable housing funds to a private company that wants to buy the entire former Navy housing complex on White Street for 60 million dollars.

The City would pay the buyer 12.5 million. In exchange, the buyer would deed restrict the 157 existing units and any other units constructed on the 24 plus acre property for use as “affordable housing.”

At Tuesday’s meeting, the Commission could adopt a Resolution nominating the new 12.5 million dollar Peary Court deal to the Land Authority. After approval by the County Commission on the 18th of May, the Land Authority would disperse the 12.5 million at the closing. Peary Court would remain deed restricted affordable workforce housing in perpetuity.

But, isn’t that a lot of money to be rushed through during one Tuesday night meeting?

“The seller literally has a gun to our heads,” says local realtor Claude Gardner, “We only have one month to give our answer.” Apparently another buyer is standing by, having also made a 60 million dollar offer for the property for a market rate project.

“We can not make it work at 60 million. If the City votes down the 12.5 million or if we need to renegotiate land regulations – we’re out,” says Gardner.

“We” is Claude Gardner and his client Jeff Cornfeld. Mr. Cornfeld owns a real estate investment and management company based in Hollywood, Florida. He also owns several properties in Key West including a stately home on Elizabeth Street.

This time there will be no referendum.

So, is the Commission pulling an “end run” on voters? “What part of no don’t they understand,“ asks citizen advocate Christine Russel, ”I thought it was pretty clear we did not want the City investing in Peary Court.”

“I think what this proposal does is solve a lot of the issues that came out of the referendum,” says Gardner. He co-owns Knight and Gardner Realty and is the sole architect of this new proposal. “If this goes forward the City could achieve its goal: Peary Court would be 100% dedicated to affordable housing,” says Gardner.

So far it seems he’s convinced almost everyone he’s spoken to. We spent two hours with him Wednesday morning, unrolling plans and discussing land use regulations.

Here are some of the pros and cons associated with spending 12.5 million in Land Authority funds to deed restrict Peary Court.

Pros

Obviously the City not “owning” Peary Court has certain advantages. The City’s proforma on a possible purchase had indicated a profit, but any fluctuation in costs could have pushed the project into the red: there was a question about the cost of maintenance, the risk of skyrocketing flood insurance or interest rates, uncertainty as to boundary lines separating the portion that would not be purchased by the City. The repayment of the 46 million dollar loan was contingent on rents remaining at today’s historically high levels for the next 30 years, regardless of any possible economic downturn. All of these issues are no longer taxpayer concerns, but the benefit of having Peary Court restricted to “affordable housing” is now a real possibility at a fraction of the cost.

One may regret that the City will not have full ownership under the new deal, however in private hands Peary Court will continue producing revenue in the form of property taxes (which help fund the school system and more). Property tax last year was $343,400. When the property sells, taxes will be adjusted up to reflect the higher sale price but also down as a result of the “affordable” deed restrictions.

It also avoids a pernicious conflict of interest: How could we expect the City to fight the housing crisis and diligently keep trying to lower rents when the City itself would have been dependent on high rents to keep paying its sizable mortgage?

Gardner says Cornfeld intends to build the 48 new units already permitted on the property and, if possible, many more if his request [to come after the property is purchased] for an increase in density is granted. The density is currently about half that of the adjacent neighborhood. Under the City’s workforce housing code rents for the existing 2-bedroom apartments could vary from a top rent called “middle-income affordable” ($2709/month) down to $1546/month for a “low-income affordable” unit. The total rent roll may not exceed an average rent of “moderate income plus 10%”.

Cons

Since market rate rents at Peary Court are currently $2450/month, tenants will continue to pay approximately the same amount [$2322/month called “moderate-income affordable”.]  When you get into the math it becomes apparent that the low-med-moderate-middle income “mix” option included in City code will not produce any low-income units — unless the owner plans on earning less than he’s allowed to under the guidelines.

According to the City’s own data the City has a deficit of 796 low-income rental housing units and a surplus of 270 moderate-income rental units.

Low-income salaries in Key West equate to $48,100 for a single person or $73,333 for a couple. For example, 47% of school district employees would qualify for the low-income category [if living alone]. 177  City of Key West government employees are earning less than 40,000/year, as do most service workers..

Commissioner Sam Kaufman, whose primary reason for running for office was to help tackle the affordable housing crisis, says he is “extremely disappointed’ with the new Peary Court proposal.

His concerns:

  1. It creates zero new units.
  2. It depletes the Land Authority affordable housing fund.
  3. It creates an unknown obstacle to building lower-income housing on government controlled property [Poinciana].
  4. It contravenes the voters’ intent where 58% of voters said no to Peary Court.
  5. It preserves units at the moderate level, which equates to market rate rents.

Kaufman points out that there is plenty of room over at Poinciana Plaza to build desperately needed low and median-income housing. [A “low-income affordable” efficiency apartment [400 SF] would rent for $1203/month] “And right now we have $12.5 million to do it,” he says.

Claude Gardner doesn’t disagree.

“Look, I know we need low-income affordable housing, but we also need moderate-income housing for couples, for people with children and right now we have a one-time, last chance, opportunity to keep Peary Court from becoming high end rentals or second homes. The money in the housing account will replenish. It receives over $2 Million a year. But there will never be another opportunity to save 24 acres in Key West, there will never be another Peary Court.”

So, these will be the Commissioners’ choices:

Build 12.5 million dollars worth of low-income housing and use the rent revenue to build more over the years.

or

Buy a perpetual deed restriction on all of Peary Court, a one time opportunity to keep 157 apartments from being rented for even more than the “affordable“ $2400 /month [or worse – from being turned into high-end very “unaffordable” second homes].

 

Facebook Comments

  24 Responses to “Peary Court: Plan B”

  1. This is really sad. We voted NO. Now our elected leaders do an end run and come up with “Plan B: lets just give away $12.5 million”. I suggest that we vote every one of them out of office when the vote in support of this….
    Oh..BTW has anyone noticed item number 33 on this week’s agenda: change the time of the meetings to 10am… Now they want to schedule the meetings when the public is working and cannot come to express their views…. deplorable!

  2. Someone needs to look into WHO is voting and WHO is not. They are giving away 12.5 million to basically get nothing more than a deed restriction that will not even help the very people that the money was to be used to help. And with the money gone they can’t begin to build them low cost units on property they own. And as corrupt as this city is can you trust who is counting them votes ?

    Been saying for over a year that you need to vote them all out. Not so much as one can be trusted. Start with Cates and demand a resignation. You need to clean up the corruption before it is too late.

    What I look to see is a new owner that will in less than a year be raising the rents. And he could as the new owner profit by getting a second mortgage. Put that in his pocket and stop paying the first mortgage. Collect and keep all the rents and by the time it is foreclosed he will be rich. It is a very old game. Out of the legal uses of this 12.5 million I did not read anyplace that they can just give it away.

    And then they complain that Fantasy Fest cost them money. FF is one of the few times that they are at max for tourists spending money. All places to stay go for about double so that alone is double tax income. If you don’t soon fix the corruption it might be too late to save the city.

  3. I’m sure that city attorney, Sean Smith, will find a way to tap dance around this, but the bottom line is that the city is purchasing defined rights and privileges (deed restrictions) in exchange for $12.5m in locally generated tax dollars. That is a real estate acquisition.

    The following Florida Statute addresses the way most cities address this specific topic in detail:

    420.615 Affordable housing land donation density bonus incentives.—

    For the Key West City Commission to override the requirement for a electorate vote, Sean would need to argue that there is no value to the deed restrictions. As such, the city would not actually acquire anything, and it won’t need to go to the electorate for a decision, but if that were the case, then why would the city pay $12.5m for nothing? I’m curious how he will be able to argue out of that corner. The irony to all of this is that if this “Plan B” had come before the electorate first, then it would have probably passed in the March election.

    http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?mode=View%20Statutes&SubMenu=1&App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=deed+restriction&URL=0400-0499/0420/Sections/0420.615.html

  4. Hope the voters remember this at election time. They will just give your 12 million away and not fix a dam thing for the low income people. And any chance for low income homes being built are gone. You voted them in. See what happens when you vote corrupt people into office ? The people are getting screwed in this deal and nothing will stop them. Hope your happy with them. I would buy tar and feathers.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. See our Privacy Policy here: https://thebluepaper.com/privacy-policy/

Close