Mar 202015

Genocide of African-Americans

Dr. Huggins

Dr. Huggins

by Martha K. Huggins, Ph.D., Tulane University Emerita…

The respected investigative journalism organization, ProPublica,[i] recently concluded, using the FBI’s woefully incomplete statistics on “justifiable” civilian killings by law enforcement (see Huggins, The Blue Paper #102), that between 2010 and 2012, “young black males…were at a far greater risk of being shot dead by police than their white counterparts—[in fact] 21 times greater….” While I would confidently agree that Blacks stand a far greater chance than Whites of being killed by law enforcement, I argue that the Bureau’s statistics do not allow this statistical conclusion about the probability of different racial groups being slain by police. The FBI’s data, as I illustrated earlier in the Blue Paper (#102), point only to the extra-judicial and extra-constitutional consequences of law enforcement making judgments on civilian killings by one of their own.

The FBI statistics on “justifiable” killings by law enforcement therefore suggest a troubling fact about police carrying out street ‘justice’: When US police investigate a cop’s use of lethal force, it is 21 times more likely that a Black youth’s slaying by law enforcement will be deemed “justifiable” than when a cop kills a White youth. This finding points to how ‘justice’ operates in US in practice, de facto, rather than in theory, de jure. US police ‘justice’ is far from ‘blind’; it can operate vigilante-style without legitimate checks and balances. This is why I maintain that some US law enforcement officers kill–with support from their various levels of “brass”– because they can almost always get away with it, especially if the victim is Black.

Skeptics will claim that Blacks who die at the hands of police are simply getting what they deserve because these ‘criminals’ have threatened the cop’s life. The FBI underwrites a cop’s impunity for murder by its definition of a “justifiable” killing by unjustifiably incorporating an “acceptable” motive for killing a civilian. No matter that, according to US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) statistics–derived from death certificates collected at the state level–there are extreme racial disparities among the victims of police shootings: Between 1968 and 2011, Blacks were between two to eight times more likely to die at the hands of law enforcement than whites.

But aren’t these Black victims of lethal force, in fact, criminals who threatened a “peace officers’” life? Certainly, it’s easy in most US cities to validate such a claim post-facto, especially with respect to Black victims of a police shooting. Indeed, in some US cities—especially the larger ones—between 50% and 80% of Black males between 18 and 45 are in some manner negatively attached to the criminal justice system—charged with a crime and under warrant for arrest, in jail or prison, or on probation or parole. However, the recently released DOJ report on Ferguson City police[ii] demonstrates that, at least in that city, Black residents got an over-loaded ‘rap sheet’ through the racially-targeted actions of public servants, to wit: Seventy-five percent of adult Black Ferguson residents had an outstanding arrest warrant against them. The vast majority of the (three out of every four!) Black Fergusonians were guilty of not paying their fines for relatively minor civil infractions like traffic tickets. As a Daily Kos headline proclaimed, “Being Black in Ferguson meant being part of an artificially criminalized underclass.”[iii] The fines and fees used to enhance Ferguson City’s budget ended up creating a system of debt peonage for Blacks, with arrest, fines, and jailing and consequent hardships for Black Fergusonian families.

In the words of the DOJ, this tragic fact of especially Black working-class life in the US is hardly unique to Ferguson. Indeed research cited by the New York Times,[iv] indicates thatFerguson Became Symbol But Bias Knows no Border”: “Ferguson does not even rank among the top 20 municipalities in St. Louis County” in imposing bogus and race-discriminatory fines to enhance government revenues. The New York Times also discovered that Ferguson’s racial disparities in traffic stops were actually a good deal lower than those for neighboring Missouri cities, although Ferguson had the highest 2013 rate among larger Missouri cities for racial disparities arrests for violations not related to traffic—for example, shoplifting, assault, and such “nuisance” infractions and walking in streets not on sidewalks. No other large municipality in Missouri even came close to Ferguson’s 567 such cases per 1,000 population, with Blacks disproportionately targeted over whites, as Ferguson’s now deceased Michael Brown learned.

The DOJ found that, with Ferguson’s population 67% Black, this population bore a whopping 85% of police vehicle stops and 90% of citations by Ferguson police. Likewise, Ferguson Blacks constituted 93% of all arrests and 95% of all arrestees jailed for more than two days. Nearly 90% of the documented (usually excessive) force carried out by the Ferguson PD was perpetrated against Black Fergusonians. In the words of the US Department of Justice, these figures—which demonstrate the disproportionate targeting of African Americans by police and the courts–“cannot be explained by any difference in the rate at which people of different races violated the law”—that is, Whites are not necessarily less criminal than Blacks. “Rather,…[such] disparities occur, at least in part, because of unlawful bias against and stereotypes about African Americans.” One could add that personal biases are fortified and protected by such institutional supports as the financial protection afforded by government-procured liability insurance against police brutality’s possible blow-back for government and its directors and managers.(Huggins, The Blue Paper, #100).

‘No!’ the police officer retorts, ‘I’m not prejudiced, I’m just doing my job!’ But scholarly investigation going back 67 years has found that, “Merely thinking about Blacks can lead people to evaluate [Blacks’]…behavior as aggressive, to miscategorize harmless objects as weapons, [and contribute to a law enforcement officer’s] shoot[ing] quickly, and, at times, inappropriately.” Recent research nuances this well-documented finding by adding that just “Thinking of crime can trigger thoughts of Black people,” leading to the unsettling conclusion that, ‘If you’re Black, you’re criminal and dangerous and if you’re criminal, you’re Black and threatening.’[v] This mind-set helps to explain in part why a police department and its Internal Affairs Division is much more likely to judge the killing of a Black person “justifiable” than the slaying of a White perpetrator by a cop.

But could any of this possibly relate to the policing of Key West’s ‘One Human Family’? Beginning with the proposition that the institutional racism found in Ferguson is fed by the unexamined and officially protected actions of police whose activities and the statistics they generate about crime usually go unquestioned, I will next week explore the tasering, civil forfeiture, and jailing of one of Key West’s own–Everette F. Wilson—a Black man who attracted a cop’s attention, ‘as a drug dealer,’ because Mr. Wilson was ‘leaning-into-a car’s-window-while-Black.’ Mr. Wilson’s case involves an earlier traffic stop, a warrant against him, jail time, and civil forfeiture: a chemistry parallel to Ferguson’s toxic mixture.


[i] ProPublica. 2014. “Deadly force in Black and white.”

[ii] “Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department,” United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, March 4, 2015. (

[iii] Shaun King, Ferguson an apartheid police state: 21,000 residents have a staggering 16,000 open arrest warrants. Daily Kos, March 16, 2015.

[iv] Campbell Robertson, Shaila Dewan and Matt Apuzzo, “Ferguson Became Symbol, but Bias Knows No Border,” March 7, 2015.

[v] “Seeing Black: Race, Crime, and Visual Processing.” Journal of   Personality and Social Psychology. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, Vol. 87, No. 6, 876–893.

Facebook Comments

 March 20, 2015  Posted by at 3:55 am Editorial, Issue #106, Martha Huggins  Add comments

  9 Responses to “US Law Enforcement Kills with Impunity– Especially When the Victim is Black, Part 1:”

  1. It seems as more and more racists come out of the closet and don’t burst into flame they become emboldened. If they have a uniform, all the better. Is there an Amerocentric “Kristallnacht” in our future? Hell-in-a-hand-basket, comes to mind.

  2. P.S. Brilliant report! Looking forward to part two. Thank you, Dr. Huggins.

  3. Dr. Huggins, These are eye opening statistics. I have one bitch with how the Ferguson affair has been given to us in the general public. With such a majority of Afro-Americans making up this city, why should there ever be a white mayor, school board, police chief, etc., other than the fact that the black folks are not participating in our democracy. Personally, I think the Democrats missed a big opportunity by not trumpeting this to the people of Ferguson and the minority population in general in this country. But the Dems not being politically smart does not surprise me. Thanks for your excellent work.

    • Very important question. Racism and political ambitions often reinforce one another. As President Obama stated very early on in the Ferguson Michael Brown case, ‘the [Governor of Missouri is a good man and I trust him to do the right thing.’ Well he didn’t and DOJ had to do it. I’m interested in your answer to your question. MArtha

      • Martha, My answer is quite simple: I’ve always been a believer in environmental factors in shaping a human being. The further down the social lamination of any society, the less involved the people will be, the less prepared for democracy they will be. Change thru political factors is usually a slow, tedious journey, something a poor person has little patience for or faith in. The Ferguson affair was a perfect moment to try and change this cynicism and to get people like this more involved … a missed opportunity.

  4. Your statement, “When US police investigate a cop’s use of lethal force, it is 21 times more likely that a Black youth’s slaying by law enforcement will be deemed “justifiable” than when a cop kills a White youth.”, as well as the title of your essay, seems to imply that police officers do not have impunity when they murder a white person.

    I’ve taken some time to try and locate statistics on just how many police officers in the US have been convicted of homicide while on duty. On this site,, it states, “In the past 20 years, at least 17 police officers in the United States have been charged with murder for their actions in line-of-duty shootings. None of these officers, though, was convicted of murder”.

    Do you have other statistics on the murder conviction rate of police officers in the US and particularly as it pertains to the race of the victim?

    I would also like to ask you to either keep the black, white and blue colors separated in your race palette or include statistics of black on black crime/murder, white on black crime/murder and black on white crime/murder. As the police are in a group all of their own and they are here to serve and protect their masters.

    RIP Charles Eimers, Kelly Thomas and All others of All races and colors. Your lives matter too. And especially Rachel Corrie who was murdered by the most racist group of people on God’s beautiful planet.

    • Sorry to have waited so long to resoibd to you “Sister,” I had a student’s Ph.D. dissertation to read. Let me try to cler up anything lost in my presentation, if I may? I assumed that my title made clear the cops kill with impunity, as I calculate, “especially is the victim is Black.” I looked at the statistics that you have found and I am not a bit surprised that only 17 killer cops have been charged with murder and none was convicted. I think that its very safe to say that its almost impossible to convict cop who kills on duty with murder. I certainly saw this playout in the trials of cops who killed in the first days after Katrina (in New Orleans). Your source for these figures is new to me, congrats for finding it. I will look at it. Please let me know when you find more materials if you want to share them. On more point, I said nothing in my piece about civilian black-on-back killings or white-on-white. Like you, I am interested in when agents of government kill. Curiously, when the FBI reports on the former–civilians killin civilians–such homicides are often spoken about as “murder,” a designation not attached to law enforcers who kill civilians–these are “killings” in FBI talk. Thanks for engaging with me.

  5. I truly appreciate the response Dr. Huggins and I need to apologize for not being more clear on what I meant as far as blurring the colors.
    Oftentimes I’ve noticed journalists trying to lump the police racist brutality in with white racism toward the black community and I personally don’t think they should be blended into one and the same. I’ve looked at the fbi civilian murder statistics by race and they certainly do not compare to the police ‘killing’ race statistics. If my math is correct, for 2013, whites were responsible for about 7.5% of black murders. Blacks were responsible for about 14% of white murders and blacks were responsible for about 90% of black murders. If I am understanding what you have written to mean that black people are 21 times more likely than a white person to be killed by a cop, then I don’t see those numbers correlating in the general populace. That is why I feel it is necessary to keep the blue and the white separate in the analysis.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. See our Privacy Policy here: