Open Letter to City Commisioners: Second Solar Carport is Now Being Constructed?!
Dear Commissioners,
Many of you have voiced interest about how HARC approved the carport solar arrays at Glynn Archer. The video of the meeting is “not available” on the City’s website.
I have been given a copy of the HARC meeting on April 24, 2014 when the project was presented and approved, and have uploaded the latter portion of the video where the solar panel carports are mentioned.
The cascade of mistakes made by staff and commission that resulted from the architects misunderstanding of the Florida Building Code in relation to solar panels, as well as the HARC guidelines, is stunning.
When directly asked, the HARC planner believed the carports were “svelte” and therefore would be fine. Note: “svelte” is not in the guidelines. The HARC planner failed to mention numerous guidelines that were being violated.
Further, HARC commissioners openly criticized the guidelines (one took umbrage with the word “detriment” in relation to undesirable solar panel placement), others were so enamored with the idea of solar they completely ignored the guidelines which are very specific and detailed about solar collectors. The chairman at the time, Michael Miller, did criticize the enormous carport solar arrays, and stated there needed to be 18-foot trees to buffer it or “the neighbors will wonder how this passed HARC”. He also called the official landscape plan around the carports an “undernourished hammock”.
I hope you will take 9 minutes to watch the video: https://youtu.be/4bfKXNSmmHE
Sincerely,
-Dave Dlugitch
Thanks, Dave –
I attended the city commission meeting during which the solar carport was on the printed agenda and Commissioner Margaret Romero told Bert Bender that he was liable for the cost of tearing down the carport and putting the solar arrays on top of the new city hall. I think I heard said during that meeting that there were 3 architects on HARC, which approved the solar arrays carport. That’s not counting architect Bert Bender.
Bert Bender is not on HARC, does not work for the city, and did not approve the solar carport for the city. HARC approved the solar carports for the city, along with the then City Planner, and then the City Commission approved it. So this former practicing lawyer does not think the city should give any thought to suing Bert Bender, who is hearing impaired, reads lips, which was known to HARC, the City Planner, and to the City Commission when it hired Bender to design and oversee the building of the new city hall.
Looks to me the solar carport went too long being addressed by the city commission. I wonder when neighbor complaints were filed with the city, and how long after that it got onto a commission agenda?
It really is a solar carport. You can see that plain as day anytime during construction hours. Every space in the carport is taken to get the vehicles in the shade and out of the sun.
I agree with HARC member and architect Michael Miller. Plant a screen of tall trees, and even lower bushes, so the neighbor residents across United Street cannot see the two solar carports so well. That might not make the neighbors entirely happy, but tearing down the solar carport and rewiring part of the interior of the new city hall for the solar arrays,and putting the arrays on the roof seems to me like the most unhappy outcome at this juncture.
Hi Sloan,
Bert Bender is now a HARC Commission member, appointed by Mayor Cates, until 12/15/2017. The irony is not lost on me.
Here is what I originally wrote to the Commissioners. I’m providing it here because it details which HARC guidelines were violated by the solar carports:
I brought this to the city leadership attention with an email (included below) back in February, but it was entirely ignored.
As I mentioned in my February email, not only is the appearance of the solar panels an issue, but also the structure housing the equipment converting the solar power to grid power is an equal mystery. Why did it have to be placed in that location? (see a photo of the grid-tie structure here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6CIxVRXBk88MlRBMXJZVUxtVkk/view?usp=sharing )
In addition, the angle of the solar panel structure doesn’t make sense. It is facing more than 30 degrees to the Southeast. That is far from the optimal angle for the most effective operation. If anything, placing the panels on the roof of the city hall would result in facing to the Southwest. That would produce much more power. Isn’t that supposed to be the reason for them in the first place?
We all know that the real reason for the solar panels is to provide covered parking for city leadership and department heads. Anything else is just smoke and mirrors.
——– Forwarded Message ——–
Subject: The New United Street Bleachers
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:38:32 -0500
To: Craig Cates , Margaret Romero , Samuel Kaufman , Shawn D. Smith , James K. Scholl , Richard Payne , Clayton Lopez , Richard Boettger , Jimmy Weekley , Enid Torregrosa
Dear Mayor Cates, Commissioners, Mr. Scholl, Mr. Smith and Ms. Torregrosa,
I am writing today about the new solar panel and grid tie structures
that have been installed behind the new city hall. They are both
absolute eyesores. How were they ever permitted? When I looked back at
all of the city hall complex drawings, I could not find a single one
that showed these current structures.
As you can see in the accompanying photos (with captions), the solar
panel array structure has all the appeal of the underside of stadium
bleachers. The grid tie building appears to have just been dropped in
the middle of the soon to be parking lot where no amount of landscaping
will mitigate its hideous, out of place, boxlike appearance.
Furthermore, I must question the competence of the engineers who placed
the solar array in the parking lot. It was installed so that it is
facing in a Southeast direction. That is one of the worst angles that
could have been used for generating solar power. We also need to
remember that this entire parking area will be landscaped with trees.
They will only further diminish the solar efficiency once they grow to
height and project shade on the panels.
Why wasn’t the solar facility installed on the city hall roof like every
other urban solar farm? On the roof, it would be facing to the Southwest
and maximizing the power output. As everything currently sits, only a
fraction of the power will be produced. Even a facility a third a size
of the current one would create more total daily output if it were
installed on the city hall roof.
The irony to all of this is that I’m a huge proponent of solar power. I
lived aboard a sailboat for years, and solar panels were my primary
source of power. When I read that the city was spending a huge amount of
money on a solar array, I knew that it was strictly a “feel good”
gesture. The money spent will never be recovered in the cost of energy
savings, but it was something that looked good, city leaders could talk
about with pride and made people think Key West is a green city. The
current solar facilities, however, are just expensive eyesores that will
not perform as expected and detract from the historic beauty of the new
city hall.
Best regards,
Colby Fisher
Colby, thanks for this history. Utility Board member Tim Root told me the solar arrays at new city hall will provide all of its electricity needs when the sun is out, there will be batteries to store sun energy not used, and new city hall might operate totally independent of Keys Energy.
According to the architect that presented at the project’s HARC meeting, in the video I uploaded he states that the solar panels will power the parking lot lights. That is all. Just the parking lot lights. (he does mention that if there is excess power, it will be dumped in to the grid)
There is no way those solar carports can power that building. Hundreds of computers, printers, office machines, massive air-conditioning and mechanical equipment, and hundreds of lights.
Sloan, I think you should speak with Tim Root again. Someone is mistaken. It would make no sense whatsoever to store solar power energy in batteries when a grid is available. That would require a huge expenditure on very expensive storage batteries. In any case, the power that the building would consume during sunlight hours would far exceed the amount that an entire parking lot full of panels would provide. On those rare occasions during non-working hours when air conditioners, air handlers, lights and computers aren’t running, there may be some excess capacity, but it would be far more efficient to put that power back into the grid than to store it in batteries.
Hi, Colby –
If I speak to Tim again, either he will say, yes, that’s what he told me, or he will say, no, he told me something else. Then, it will be me who didn’t remember correctly, or it will be Tim who changed his story.
I remember asking Tim if the new city hall arrays would extra electricity not currently needed be sold back to Keys Energy?, which is how some solar systems work, and Tim said no, extra solar energy would be stored in batteries. I recalled thinking that odd, there is a lot of flack about solar systems which use batteries, which are hard to cleanly dispose of when they wear out. Why not just sell the extra electricity produced back to Keys Energy?
I also asked Tim why come Keys Energy did not install solar arrays on its renovated headquarters building in Key West?, and he said it would not have been economically feasible. It’s economically feasible at new city hall because BP money subsidized it. Or some of it.
I told Tim Mt. Trashmore could be covered with solar arrays and produce a heap of electricity going straight to Keys Energy, for it to spread around through its grid. Tim said that would not be economical, either.
He said Keys Energy and other electric companies are together building solar arrays near their power producing plant near Tampa, I think, to supplement electricity production there, which will be spread around that entire electric grid and some of will reach Keys Energy. I said the only thing growing greener ever day at Key Energy is its bank account.
This was at a Hometown PAC candidate forum this year, before the forum started. Tim walked over to where I was sitting and initiated the discussion.
During the Utility Board part of the forum, as I recall, Tim described the solar arrays being built on the mainland, and he also spoke to the solar arrays at new city hall, BP money, and why they did not put arrays on Keys renovated headquarters, not economically viable. He did not say new city hall would get all of its electricity from the solar arrays being put in there, when he was being grilled by Hometown’s inquisitors.
Todd German told me today, he had seen this with his own two eyes, there are lot of solar arrays at the San Diego airport.
http://www.san.org/News/Article-Detail/ArtMID/952/ArticleID/47/San-Diego-International-Airport-Partners-with-Borrego-Solar-to-Install-33-MW-Solar-System
I google imaged “solar arrays at San Diego airport and photos of those arrays came up.
I told Todd I was standing at the city bus stop today on United Street, right beside new city hall, and there were a workers there. Then two men walked toward me from the Cuban take out restaurant attached to the pay laundry across United. One the men said Hi, I said Hi back. I asked if them were working on the new city hall? Yes. On Sunday? Yes. Being paid double time? Triple time, one of the men said, happy as could be, he seemed. I didn’t ask them about the solar arrays. The work I saw being done was inside new city hall.
To me, the issue is whether the City must abide by the same regulations that it insists its residents follow. The City has erected a massive eyesore that is clearly in violation of HARC guidelines, and no citizen would be allowed to build anything similar.
Below is a letter from the current Chair of HARC, Bryan Green, to the Mayor, all City Commissioners and the City Manager on August 13, 2016:
The problem is, the city itself did not follow its own rules, and is trying to blame the architect. If you don’t like what the city did, then fire the city employees who gave the architect the green light – pun not optional. Let’s see. The HARC commissioners need to be fired. The city planner already moved on. The mayor and then city commissioners, who gave the final approval, need to be fired.
Maybe I misunderstood Tim Root, but I recall being surprise he had said the solar arrays would power city hall.
Why is no one (other than myself) complaining about the butt ugly grid-tie structure that is sitting in the middle of the parking lot? Here is a photo of it:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6CIxVRXBk88MlRBMXJZVUxtVkk/view?usp=sharing
We can argue about how bad the solar panels look, but there is absolutely no excuse at all to just sit this big square concrete and metal box in the middle of that open space. The engineers and architect could have easily moved it a hundred feet or so off to the side or somewhere else that is not in direct view to everyone. Where it now sits is just lazy on too many levels.
I understand that that big ugly box in the middle of the parking lot is a back-up generator. I, too, have wondered why it was placed where it is. It is an eyesore.
I was told yesterday that Bert Bender became a HARC commissioner when MIchael Miller resigned, about 8 1/2 months ago, some time after HARC approved the solar arrays at new city hall.