Nov 272015
 

football

by Jerome Grapel…….

Masculine gender violence has become a high profile issue in our society, made even more salient by the rash of such behavior originating in the culture of professional football. That such behavior seems to exceed the average in this environment is not that surprising.

I’ve had the opportunity to be an athletic participant at a large university. Although each sport is a segregated activity, all the athletes play under the umbrella of a single institution and a particular Athletic Director. This creates a certain degree of communication and familiarity amongst all the “jocks”. I don’t think I’d be risking too much credibility if I said that within this athletic community, those who could be considered the most — and I’ll be nice here — “eccentric”, would be the football players.

For the average human being, the idea of violently colliding with each other every 30 seconds or so, is not an attractive option. If this is what turns you on; if this is something that brings joy to your life, then it might be said you are operating in a parallel universe, one where most of us don’t want to go. If this kind of violence is not only how you feel fulfillment, but your path to fame, adulation and wealth, it is not that difficult to see some of this behavior bleeding over into your personal life. At the university stage of existence, a certain kind of furniture smashing, dormitory hi-jinx always seemed more common to the football players. At a later, more mature (?) stage of life, these tendencies can take on darker, more satanic attributes.

Put simply, you have to be a little nuts to be a good football player.

But when it comes to the bearded side of the gender divide, I’m not about to let the rest of us off the hook. In a society that has been male dominated for as far back as history can remember, I’d say even the most enlightened amongst us “faux macho men” still carry around some traces of male chauvinism. My initial reaction to the now infamous Ray Rice incident might throw some light on this assertion.

Rice, of course, is the well known football player who was caught by hotel security cameras one punching his girl friend into oblivion. My guess is that most of you remember the recorded evidence: the couple was obviously not having a good day and by the time they entered an elevator to adjourn for the night, the ill feelings had boiled over to the point where the woman lost her composure. With a hateful scowl etched into her face, with her fists clenched at her side and her head thrust forward, she advanced on Rice with what boxing people call “bad intentions”. Regardless of who the aggressor was at this moment, what Rice did — and I remind the reader he is a muscular, world class athlete with perhaps a 100 pound advantage on his feminine attacker — was not only unacceptable from a moral standpoint, but recklessly dangerous. He laid her out with a right hand to the jaw that — and I do not think it is unreasonable to suggest this — could have killed her.

It’s embarrassing to admit the first thoughts that popped into my mind when seeing this spectacle, thoughts that perhaps still confirm the generations and generations of emotional sickness my gender has been inculcated with, thoughts that still linger in our innards like a perpetual sour stomach. I thought — “gee, someone’s gotta teach that woman (or did I think a worse word?) not to lead with her head”.

There, I said it. I’ll accept whatever ill will comes my way for it. I cannot defend such a cavalier attitude, but I can try to mitigate it.

By the time I saw this video for the first time, the world already knew the woman involved was going to “stand by her man”. This seems to be a fairly common occurrence in these incidents. Many studies have been done in trying to unravel the motivations for such a syndrome. The conclusions set forth by the agglomerated work of such studies often seem plausible, rational and acceptable. I accept them. But I also reserve the right to say this: somewhere along the line, a human being has to take a stand, has to draw a line, has to delineate a threshold for unforgivable behavior. If Rice’s girl friend can assimilate being knocked unconscious for 10 minutes into her long term relationship with him — what am I supposed to think? How should I feel? Honestly, I don’t really know at this point, but I do know my empathy for her has been challenged. This is especially so in this particular case. It did not happen in a dysfunctional, narrow, ignorant environment. The couple had been together since high school and had reaped the benefits of Rice’s celebrity. They’d known the good life. They’d been around. The victim herself is uber attractive, articulate and intelligent. Her options in life would seem both positive and infinite. And yet … go figure.

This essay was inspired by the latest NFL domestic abuse incident involving one Greg Hardy. Hardy is one of those mammoth creatures whose primary job is to chase quarterbacks in the hope of eventually dishing out the physical brutality they deserve. Unfortunately, he seems to have confused his now ex-girlfriend with a quarterback, such mayhem being duly recorded pictorially for all to see. This has caused the usual outrage across the broad sweep of American culture, an outrage that has been distilled down into the following question: should Hardy be allowed to play in the NFL?

There is a certain group of people here who are not being called out for the abject hypocrisy their outrage represents. I’ll call this group the consumers of the football product and I’ll get back to them.

I’ve never felt the NFL or MLB or the NBA, etc., has any right to discipline its players for anything they do in their private lives. In my estimation, there are only 2 entities that have such a right: 1) the law, and-or 2) the people who pay them.

What we call the NFL is a creation of the entrepreneurs trying to make money through the game of football. It is primarily their public relations mechanism and its job is to provide the best environment possible for pecuniary success in this business. The NFL does not invest in the overhead of doing business in football, nor does it collect the money that covers this overhead. The NFL works for those who do provide these functions (the owners of the teams). The NFL is akin to something like the American Dairy Association, or even the NRA, whose real job is to protect the interests of those who sell guns. None of these entities — and least of all the NFL, whose foundation for success is laid over massive amounts of gambling — should ever take on the role of some kind of “morality police”.

In many cases, whatever the law sanctions the transgressor with (or doesn’t sanction) is deemed insufficient by that fickle, ambiguous concept known as “public opinion”. If there were ever an instance where the unbridled power of the market place should decide these issues, this is it. This kind of market leverage can be applied in 2 primary ways: 1) the abandonment of sponsorship by those businesses not wanting to be associated with such behavior, and 2) a mutiny in fan base support. With regard to the latter — and this is where the hypocrisy spoken of earlier comes into play — I’ve never seen it be a factor.

Sponsorship pressure played a role in punishing Ray Rice way beyond what the NFL had deemed proper (the law never acted in Rice’s case). In fact, it pretty much ended his playing career. But another factor cannot be overlooked. Rice had a lot of mileage on his football career and was already at that tipping point where he was beginning to not be what he used to be. His team, the Baltimore Ravens, that is, those who paid his check, had to make a market driven business decision. Was Rice’s football talent worth the public relations-sponsorship negativity?

The Greg Hardy case is somewhat more complicated. For one thing, the beastly qualities that make a defensive lineman a valued commodity are at their most mature expression in Greg Hardy. His value as an athlete is still intact. But Hardy, unlike Rice, has been in and out of trouble with some consistency throughout his career. When this latest spate of domestic violence went public, his then team, the San Francisco 49’ers, decided it was just not worth the hassle to have him around. In addition, he had been sanctioned by the law, putting his football career on hold. When his penal debt to society had been fulfilled, the question was — would anyone let him play football?

Once again, as it should be, the “market” was being asked its opinion. And along comes Jerry Jones, the flamboyant owner of the league’s signature franchise, the Dallas Cowboys; along comes Jerry Jones, Donald Trump with a southern twang; along comes Jerry Jones, the embodiment of Texas pinky ring ostentation and wealth, to give Greg Hardy a “second chance” (or was it a 3rd or 4th?). I can use this guy. He can bust some heads. He can make me some money.

And you know what? Jerry was right. In spite of the distaste and general all around feeling of ill will Hardy’s return generated, it had all pretty much blown over when, for the first time in this case, some photographic evidence of what Hardy had done to this woman went public. And the public opinion outrage meter went ballistic. Something should be done. This man should not be playing in the NFL. The guillotine!

This is where we stand right now. Jerry Jones, the man who pays Greg Hardy, has a business decision to make. The ball is in his court. If he decides to stay with Hardy, which is what he seems to be doing, this means he is sending the ball back to the consumer of the football product.

So here you are, average football fan, you are disgusted by Greg Hardy. He’s a beast, an animal, he’s not worthy of playing in the NFL. But you know what, average football fan, I think you are full of you know what. Will you stop going to Dallas Cowboy games? Will you stop buying their merchandise? Will you stop watching them on TV? Will you use your leverage to make Jerry Jones comply? Yeah, fat chance of that. Your football fix is much more important to you than a defenseless woman battered by a 300 pound man. And I’ll go even further: if Greg Hardy was terrorizing quarterbacks as you’d hoped; if he were leading the Dallas Cowboys to the playoffs, you’d be loving Greg Hardy. Admit it.

In a way, I agree with Jerry Jones. Hardy was prosecuted, he did his time, he’s a free man with the right to work. If you, average football fan, don’t like what Jones has done (I don’t.), then show your displeasure with action. Otherwise, just shut up.

Print Friendly
Jerome Grapel
Jerome Grapel was born in Brooklyn, NY in 1945 and raised in the New York City area in what could be called a vintage middle class upbringing. He attended Temple University in Philadelphia where he played baseball and graduated with a B.A. in history in 1967. With a "noticeable lack of vocation for anything, and not knowing what else to do," he continued at Temple Law School, graduating in 1970.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More articles by Post Consumer Man prior to November, 2014.
 November 27, 2015  Posted by at 12:36 am Essays from Post Consumer Man, Issue #142  Add comments

  9 Responses to “Domestic Violence & the NFL”

  1. well i hope this doesn’t mean the space-time continuum has ruptured but, we are in complete agreement Mr. Grapel; nicely elucidated.

  2. I remember an Oprah Winfrey show over twenty years ago and she had a group of ex and active football players on the show to expose and discuss domestic abuse by football players. It is/was rampant. One guy said these players are coached and encouraged to be as animalistic and violent as humanly possible and then, somehow, go home and be normal husbands or boyfriends and a lot of theses guys just can’t compartmentalize. Add steroid rage to the mix and I’m surprised there aren’t more beat downs… The weight that money carries is obvious and as for women that stay with men that beat the crap out of them, that is a matter for psychologists. Thanks for the witnessing, Jerome.

    • Alex, Your comments are as enlightening as your articles. Thanks. I’d like to say one thing, something that is in tune with what I said to Rick in answering his comment. Right now, the hottest player in the NFL is one Cam Newton, quarterback for the unbeaten Carolina Panthers. Newton has come under some criticism for a long, drawn out dance he does after he scores a TD. It’s a stupid dance that goes on for much longer than what has been usual up until now in the NFL. Some opposing players have been angered by it, but, in general, the sports punditry world poo-poos it off, it’s OK, entertainment, etc., etc. Now, I’m not against spontaneous joy from an athlete after doing something good. When Jose Bautista threw his bat with joy after hitting a game winning home run in the playoffs … no problem. But what Newton does is childish, obnoxious and rude. I’d like to ask the fans and pundits that think it is OK the following question: if someone from an opposing team conspires to hurt Newton if they get the chance, might it not be justified? Might it not be considered his Kharma? ciao, Jerome

  3. I’m with Alex. Women who date Marine combat veterans and football players should rethink their priorities.

    As for the public, at a bird-day party yesterday one gent opined that the Boston Patriots’ opponents should go after Tom Brady every play until he is knocked out of the game. Injured. Broken. The classiest and most skilled of players. That is pro football “culture.”

    • My Dear Boettchgy, First off, it always brightens my day to know you’ve been reading my stuff. Thanks. I believe your comment is very important for this reason: what I am saying in this essay is not just constricted to domestic violence. I really believe that what we see from the world of pro football (and that includes the college game, and anyone who thinks they are not the same thing probably still confuses guys in drag with women) is indicative of a society that is beginning to lose its way, who’s nobility is fading, etc. Its attitude is wrong. It is perverting why it is we should even be playing sports. Thanks Rick, ciao, Jerome

  4. Keysbum, No, I don’t think there has been any rupture. I have much respect for the things you point out. The fact that there is not a perfect overlap of feelings and understandings, does not change that. I’m honored that you read my stuff. Thanks for the comment, PCM

  5. Jerome,

    Outstanding article. Excellent presentation, per usual.

    I don’t know how to approach a comment. I’m stricken with at least a ‘double-whammy’.

    I’m a 10 year football player recruited by a college—Marine combat veteran–Amateur Boxer–And–Being born & raised in the South Bronx I speak a different and classier dialect than most Americans. Unfortunately, sometimes this distinction can cause misunderstandings with those attempting to communicate with me.

    You know how that goes Jerome, what’s the name, Joey Buttafucko…

    Please let Rick know there’s some hope, as I continue to move forward with measures for self-development…

    Jerome, the depth and strength of your article is undeniable. Thanks again.

    Love, Blessings & Respect To All…

    • Sorry, John.

      YOU are certainly no threat to women, and I am sure one who would defend them to the death. I had a good friend in Fort Worth who went through the worst of Viet Nam–two best friends killed by snipers on either side of him in the same mission, being present at My Lai-type attacks, a dear John from his fiance–and came back the kindest and gentlest of family men.

      It is a staple of romantic fiction and true in our culture that too many women want to have a bad boy they can tame. They want a John Donnelly to use his toughness to defend them. But my point is that they are taking a chance to do so, to “rethink” as it were.

      Our thanks to Jerome for provoking these thoughtful discussions.

  6. John, It always makes my day to hear from you. Let me clarify something that my article perhaps doesn’t explain properly. I’m not against physically aggressive sports. Physicality and violence are not only a part of the human condition, but a part of the whole ecosystem. But we as human beings should be learning how to harness these tendencies and use them only when absolutely necessary. Supposedly, we are not “animals” in this sense. Physical sports can help us in this respect. But when such a sport loses its nobility; when it is played with an attitude that just leads to senseless violence, not just on the field of play, but in life in general, it fails in its mission. Our brand of football has gone there, mainly because it sells (so what’s new?) But I don’t think people go to football games to see Cam Newton do some stupid dance. I think the people who allow this to go on are underestimating the sport they live by. It is better than that. Thanks John, Jerome