Nov 032017
 

by Thomas L. Knapp……..

President Donald Trump and Republican congressional leaders rolled out their new tax plan on November 2. Since all bills must have titles, they’re calling this one “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.”

Republican “tax reform” theatrics have worn thin over  many months of waiting, but I still prefer a more theatrical title. “A tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing” rings true. Four centuries later, Shakespeare’s MacBeth is a better description of the matter than any coming out of Washington, DC.

Yes, there’s plenty of quibbling across the aisle over everything from top rates to the home mortgage interest deduction, but neither party’s politicians seem willing to tackle the most basic, indisputable, and relevant fact: Since Congress isn’t cutting spending, Congress won’t be cutting taxes either.

In 2017, the US government will spend more than $4 trillion. That’s 21.5% of Gross Domestic Product, more than one out of every five dollars in wealth created by the US economy.

In order for that wealth to be spent by the political class, it must first be taken from the productive class. To spend a dollar, one must have a dollar. There are three ways to get the money, and all of them are taxation whether they’re called that or not.

The first and most obvious way, and the way dealt with in “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” is through overt taxation. Personal income taxes. Payroll taxes linked to Social Security and Medicare. Capital gains taxes. Corporate taxes.  Tariffs. Etc., etc., ad nauseam.

The second way is borrowing. Government borrowing is more accurately described as deferred taxation. Borrowers have to be paid back. When government borrows a dollar, it is promising its creditors that it will, sooner or later, tax that dollar out of you (or your descendants) to pay back the principal, and that until then it will tax you a little bit each year to keep up interest payments.

The third way is inflation (which is tied to borrowing in ways too complicated and boring for a short column to cover). For all the murky descriptions of what inflation is, it’s simple: The government creates more dollars out of thin air, making each dollar in your pocket worth a little less. Inflation is a tax, too. A sneaky tax, but a tax nonetheless.

For every dollar a government spends, a dollar must be taxed. The only exception to that rule is if the government collapses and leaves its creditors unpaid.

In order for Congress to truly cut taxes, it must first balance the budget, then begin cutting that balanced budget. Until and unless it does so, your taxes can only go down in the political imagination, not in reality.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Thomas L. Knapp

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.


 November 3, 2017  Posted by at 1:42 am ~ Column ~, ~ Opinion ~, Issue #241, Thomas L. Knapp  Add comments

  4 Responses to “Sorry, Republicans: If You’re Not Cutting Spending, You’re Not Cutting Taxes”

  1. Thomas, the 2017 federal deficit was $666 billion. The projected 2018 deficit is $392 billion. That would be the lowest deficit since 2007. Exactly how is that a “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury?”

    http://federal-budget.insidegov.com/l/121/2018-Estimate

    • Did you read the column? Here’ll I’ll quote it for you:

      “In order for Congress to truly cut taxes, it must first balance the budget, then begin cutting that balanced budget.”

      I have yet to see a GOP tax plan which claims to balance the budget in less than ten years, and anyone who believes Congress will stick to a ten-year budget balancing plan isn’t living in the real world.

      Until it’s balanced and then cut in balance, taxes aren’t being cut, just hidden.

  2. “To spend a dollar, one must have a dollar” is not true for the Federal Reserve. Their balance sheet shows over $4 trillion, which they created out of thin air after the 2007 Bank crisis. The bills in your wallet say “Federal Reserve Note”. No mention of the government or the Treasury.

    Theoretically, the Fed could buy all U.S. debt as it matures, then shred the bills and notes. No new wealth would be created (so no inflation pressure) but the existing $20 trillion National Debt would disappear in 30 years. Of course deficit spending would continually create more debt, but there would be less interest to pay each year.

    Such a system would be the same as the U.S. simply printing the money it needs to spend, without any borrowing. Why pay interest when you can just print?