Aug 122016
The community of Key Haven, in Key West Florida, is targeted by the FDA and Oxitec for release of genetically engineered mosquitoes in the “treated area” (TA). This amounts to human and ecological genetic experimentation with a potentially dangerous organism. While the FDA and Oxitec provide detailed data on mosquitoes, and the populations of snails, birds and more, they treat the “human population” as an afterthought in their report clearing the experiment for implementation.

The community of Key Haven, in Key West Florida, is targeted by the FDA and Oxitec for release of genetically engineered mosquitoes in the “treated area” (TA). This amounts to human and ecological genetic experimentation with a potentially dangerous organism. While the FDA and Oxitec provide detailed data on mosquitoes, and the populations of snails, birds and more, they treat the “human population” as an afterthought in their report clearing the experiment for implementation.

by By David McKalip, M.D……

Risk: The OX513A bugs could establish a new subspecies and actually survive in nature.

Implications: The FDA thinks the risk of this is low, but bases their conclusions on some assumptions that are not entirely accurate. However if the survival rate, percentage of females released or genetic assumptions are wrong, then the GMO mosquito could establish itself permanently.

Introduction to Part II.

The FDA has approved a genetic experiment on humanity and the ecosystem in Key West Florida. They propose to release genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), mosquitos, into the wild to see if they can control the Aedes mosquito population and decrease transmission of disease. The Sunbeam Times continues its series on the GMO Mosquito, known as OX513A by evaluating the risk of the new mosquito establishing itself in nature and the potential consequences. The FDA believes this risk is low, but they have based it on faulty assumptions and some deceptive statistics used by Oxitec to obtain FDA approval. In Particular, Oxitec claims that the GMO mosquito offspring will die quickly, when in fact a large percent can live weeks and breed more than once.

The Genetics of the GMO Mosquito – Ox 513A

gmo mosqitos

The Oxitec Mosquito was made in a lab and modified the genes of the Aedes subspecies it created so that the offspring of the mosquito would die quickly. The Aedes aegyptii mosquito transmits multiple diseases (Zika, Dengue, Yellow Fever and Chikungunya) and the Zika scare is renewing dramatic efforts to kill the mosquitos. Oxitec owns the OX513A Mosquito that has been modified in two major ways using multiple genes. First, the GMO mosquito has a red fluorescence gene inserted in it so it can be identified under special lights in the laboratory for further study after recovery from the wild. Secondly it contains a so-called “lethal trait”, which is a gene for a protein called a TAV (Transcription Activator Variant). The DNA inserted into the mosquito will cause the offspring to produce the TAV protein which shuts off reading of the DNA by the cells of the mosquitos. That means the mosquito will not produce the other proteins it needs to develop and will die. The TAV gene was cut out of a Herpes Simplex Virus by scientists in 1992 (a gene called VP16 – Virion Protein 16). Transcription activators are normally occurring proteins that allow our DNA to be decoded (transcribed) into RNA which is then read by the cell (translated) to make proteins. However the TAV in the Oxitec mosquito is designed to overproduce itself and take up all the other sites for transcription of proteins so that the needed proteins are not produced, leading to death. To keep the mosquitoes alive in the lab so that they can be released into the wild, the gene also includes a tetracycline sequence. Thus Oxitec can feed tetracycline to the mosquitoes during production in the lab and keep them alive long enough to be introduced into the wild. Thus the lethal trait is called tTAV (Tetracycline Responsive Transcription Activator Variant).

The genetic engineering was done by injecting the mosquito embryos under a microscope with two different tools used to alter DNA in living organisms. Known as plasmids, these tools are circles of DNA that contain sequences allowing them to integrate into the native DNA of organisms. The embryos are injected very soon after fertilization in what is called the pre-blastoderm phase, as shown in this video. One plasmid contains a very powerful set of modifiers called Transposons, specifically known as “piggyBac”. Transposons allow genetic material to insert – often randomly – into genomes and can cause massive damage to the DNA. That means most injected embryos will die before producing a successfully transformed organism, in this case the OX513A. This sort of transposon can be very dangerous if artificially inserted into nature without control, which is why the OX513A uses what are called “non-autonomous” transposons. The piggyback transposon requires a helper protein – called transposase – which is contained in the second plasmid injected into the embryos and not present on the plasmid containing the lethal trait called “tTAV”. Theoretically, that should prevent any runaway activity of these transposons which now exist in the GMO mosquito. However, nature and genetic evolution being what they are, there is always a chance that over hundreds, thousands or more generations the GMO mosquitos or their offspring could change. That means these transposons could somehow become autonomous or find another organism with transposase that will allow them to leap all over a gene causing major man-made mutations in nature that would not happen naturally.

In summary, Oxitec intends to release male GMO mosquitos into the wild that contain a fluorescence gene and a lethal trait designed to kill the offspring that will occur between the OX513A and wild type (WT) mosquitoes. The idea will be that eggs from the pairing (GMO/WT) will die due to interference in the protein production of the embryos, leading to early death before they emerge from the water. The GMO mosquito will contain new genes not present in the rapidly and voluminously breeding mosquito population that also contain other elements designed to cause integration and mutation of their DNA if man-made control mechanisms fail. The mosquitos are also intended to survive if they access tetracycline as a food source, which can happen.

Read the entire article at


*Dr. McKalip is a private practice neurological surgeon with firsthand experience in genetically engineering. While a researcher and academic neurosurgeon, he ran a laboratory that created viruses to alter the DNA of brain and spinal cord cells to produce proteins to promote regrowth of neurons after spinal cord injury. Dr. McKalip was awarded an NIH grant to pursue this research. Dr. McKalip is also a clinical researcher familiar with the science of clinical trials and statistical analysis of results.

Facebook Comments

The Blue Paper thanks its many contributors.
 August 12, 2016  Posted by at 12:38 am ~ Opinion ~, Editorial, Issue #179  Add comments

  3 Responses to “Part Two of an Evaluation of the Risks vs. Benefits of the Proposed Release of GMO Mosquitoes in Florida”

  1. Zika has been around for 60 years. It wasn’t until oxitec released gmo mosquitoes in Brazil that birth defects have occured. You do the math. Additionally, we voted no. What is the purpose of voting if our wishes aren’t upheld? Whatever happened to “by the people, for the people”?

  2. The fact remains that the FDA’s finding of “no environmental impact” would actually take years of follow up studies to be able to prove that there will be no unintended consequences to humans or area wild life.

  3. I have always thought of the anti-GMO movement as the liberal version of climate change denial, and you are now confirming my belief by reprinting an article from the Sunbeam Times, a “news” blog with a long-running anti-science, anti-climate change bent (please look at their archived stories). This article has nice fancy words and graphs to sound well-informed and look “sciencey,” but its core argument comes down to the rather non-scientific phrase “there’s always a chance.” That is simply an umbrella caution that could be used in argument against nearly anything: There’s always a chance that UV rays from the computer screen will give us brain cancer. Do we take it seriously? No. Remember, with mosquitoes the demon was unleashed centuries ago: aedes aegypti is a non-native freak, and it does not belong here. It has long been an unnecessary source of death, illness, and misery – the most dangerous animal on the planet. We should work to get rid of it in the most effective way possible. The proposed Key Haven trial will not be the first time Oxitec has released these mosquitoes, and none of the earlier trials have yielded negative consequences. (No, they did NOT start Zika in Brazil.) Genetic modification is the most efficient mosquito control tool available today. It sure beats the old-school alternative of raining chemicals down on everyone and everything, while knowingly killing good bugs, too. Please don’t fall prey to confirmation bias; if you’re going to put information on this subject out there, do some of your typically excellent, original reporting. Please don’t spread this say-nothing fear-mongering.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. See our Privacy Policy here: